HomeKnow Your Rights › The Fourth Amendment Under Attack
Know Your RightsCritical — Active ViolationsUpdated March 2026

The Fourth Amendment
Is Under Attack.
Here’s How.

The Fourth Amendment protects every person in the United States — citizen or not — from unreasonable searches and seizures. It requires warrants. It protects your home, your car, your phone, and your body. The Trump administration has issued memos, directives, and policy changes that legal experts say are systematically dismantling those protections. This page explains exactly what the Amendment says, exactly what the administration is doing, and exactly what your rights are right now.

The Fourth Amendment — U.S. Constitution
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Ratified December 15, 1791 · Applies to all persons in the United States regardless of immigration status
600+
People ordered released by Chicago federal judge after warrantless ICE arrests without probable cause
55,318
Devices searched at the border in FY 2025 — mostly without suspicion
100
Mile “border zone” where standard 4th Amendment protections are reduced
May 2025
Date of secret DHS memo authorizing warrantless home entry — not revealed until Jan 2026

Three Ways the Administration Is Circumventing the Fourth Amendment

Each of the following involves a documented policy, memo, or directive — not speculation. All are sourced to primary reporting, court decisions, and official government documents.

Attack 01 — Most Critical
Warrantless Home Entry — The Secret ICE Memo
DHS memo dated May 12, 2025 · Kept secret until January 2026 · Revealed by whistleblowers

What happened: In May 2025, ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons signed an internal memo reversing decades of agency policy. The memo states that ICE officers may forcibly enter homes using only an administrative warrant — a warrant signed by ICE itself, not a judge — to arrest people with final removal orders. The memo was kept secret. Agents who knew about it were shown it verbally or in supervised settings and prohibited from keeping copies. It became public only in January 2026 when two whistleblowers filed a complaint with Congress.

“It is declaring that the fundamental protections that every court has recognized up to this point just don’t apply to DHS and to immigration stops. It would essentially be the same as if you were at the local police department, and the police officer that is both collecting the evidence and arresting you then goes and types up his own warrant to search your house.”
— Emmanuel Mauleón, Associate Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law, January 2026 (CNN)

The legal distinction that matters: There are two kinds of warrants. A judicial warrant is signed by a neutral judge after reviewing evidence of probable cause — this is what the Fourth Amendment requires for home entry. An administrative warrant is signed by an executive branch official (in this case, ICE itself) and has historically not been sufficient to enter a home without consent. The administration is now claiming the administrative warrant is enough.

“The home under all constitutional law is the most sacred place where you have a right to privacy. By this standard, spurious allegations of gang affiliation means the government can knock down your door.”
— Monique Sherman, Attorney, Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network (Common Dreams)
“It should terrify Americans. In our democracy, with vanishingly rare exceptions, the government is barred from breaking into your home without a judge giving a green light.”
— Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), on the leaked ICE memo, January 2026

What courts have said:A federal judge in Chicago ordered over 600 people released from immigration detention after finding ICE agents made warrantless arrests without probable cause. The Brennan Center for Justice has published a detailed legal analysis finding the memo violates the Fourth Amendment’s core requirement that home entry requires judicial authorization.

Flowchart — How the Administrative Warrant End-Run Works
THE LEGAL WAYICE identifies targetFinal removal order existsApply to federal judgeShow evidence, probable causeJudge reviews independentlyNeutral third party approvalJudicial warrant issuedCan legally enter homeVSTHE NEW WAY — MAY 2025 MEMOICE identifies targetFinal removal order existsICE officer writes own warrantAdministrative I-205 formNo judicial reviewSame agency arrests and warrantsForce entry into homeUsing only admin warrantCourts pushing back — Chicago judge ordered 600+ releasedBrennan Center: memo violates Fourth Amendment · ACLU challenging in multiple circuitsYou do NOT have to open your door to an administrative warrantAsk: "Do you have a judicial warrant signed by a judge?" If no — you may refuse entry
Sources: CNN, January 22, 2026 · PBS NewsHour, January 22, 2026 · NBC News, January 22, 2026 · Brennan Center for Justice, February 3, 2026 · Common Dreams · American Immigration Council, February 2026 · Just Security, March 27, 2026
Attack 02
Warrantless Phone and Device Searches at Borders and Airports
55,318 devices searched in FY 2025 · No warrant required · Affects US citizens, green card holders, and visa holders

What’s happening:CBP agents are searching phones, laptops, and tablets at ports of entry without warrants, without suspicion, and without limitations on what they can look at. In FY 2025, CBP conducted 55,318 device searches — a 16.7% spike compared to two years prior. “Advanced” searches use forensic software that extracts everything: deleted files, app data, location history, passwords. These have happened to US citizens, green card holders, visa holders, and tourists.

The social media angle: CBP has proposed requiring visitors from visa-waiver countries to provide five years of social media history before entering the US. French scientists have been denied entry after agents found messages criticizing Trump administration science funding cuts. Immigration attorneys are now advising clients to clear their phones before crossing any border.

“CBP’s new proposed policy is an alarming privacy intrusion. Ordinary US visitors should not have their online activity scraped and monitored by the Trump administration’s ever-expanding surveillance apparatus. Choosing to visit the United States cannot become synonymous with relinquishing individual privacy rights.”
— Senators Edward Markey (D-MA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), letter to CBP Commissioner, February 13, 2026
Flowchart — Your Phone at the Border: What CBP Can and Can't Do
You arrive at US border or airportCBP asks to search your deviceNo warrant required under current border exceptionUS CITIZENNON-CITIZENYou can refuse to unlockCannot be denied entry for refusalDevice may be seized temporarilyRefusal may cause denial of entryGreen card holders cannot be deniedentry for political views aloneIF THEY PROCEED WITH SEARCHBasic search (manual scroll)No suspicion required · Any agent can do itPhotos, texts, apps visibleAdvanced search (forensic)Requires "reasonable suspicion" · Senior approvalExtracts deleted files, passwords, location historyProtect yourself before you travelLog out of all apps · Delete sensitive apps · Use a travel burner phone · Store data in the cloudEFF recommendation: a cheap phone with minimal data is the safest option at any border crossing
Sources: EFF / ACLU amicus brief, Third Circuit, March 3, 2026 · FindLaw, March 25, 2026 · Newsweek, March 2025 · Senators Markey and Wyden letter, February 13, 2026
Attack 03
Warrantless Vehicle Stops, Racial Profiling, and the 100-Mile Border Zone
Expanded under second Trump term · Kavanaugh concurrence cited · 2/3 of US population lives within 100-mile zone

What’s happening:Under the second Trump administration, vehicle stops have become routine — cars pulled over in the middle of streets based on occupants’ appearance. CBP’s enforcement radius extends 100 miles from any US border, which includes most major American cities: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Miami, Seattle, Detroit. Within this zone, agents have expanded authority to stop vehicles without the normal Fourth Amendment requirement of individualized suspicion.

The Kavanaugh problem:In a 2024 Supreme Court case, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence that immigration advocates say blesses racial profiling as a factor in immigration stops. Legal experts describe stops motivated by racial profiling as violating the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable seizures — but with this concurrence, some courts may allow them.

“ICE agents detained undocumented residents as well as citizens, without producing a warrant. This egregious act is in plain violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
— Newark Mayor Ras J. Baraka, January 23, 2026 statement
“The Fourth Amendment applies to everyone in the U.S., not just individuals with legal status. Removing that protection would be an abuse of power that destroys our privacy, making Americans feel unsafe and vulnerable in the places where our children play and our loved ones sleep.”
— Christopher A. Wellborn, President, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Flowchart — The 100-Mile Border Zone: Where Your Rights Are Reduced
OUTSIDE 100 MILESStrongest protectionsWarrant required to stopIndividualized suspicion neededCannot be stopped based onappearance aloneStandard 4th Amendmentprotections fully apply100-MILE BORDER ZONECovers: NY, LA, Chicago, Houston,Miami, Seattle, Detroit — 2/3 of US pop.Reduced protectionsCBP can stop vehicleswithout full probable causeCan ask about citizenshipwithout individualized basisAT THE BORDER / PORTWeakest protectionsNo warrant for device searchNo suspicion required forbasic device searchSocial media may be reviewedCan deny non-citizens entryfor content on deviceWHAT YOU CAN ALWAYS DO — ANY LOCATIONRemain calm · Ask if you are free to go · Do not physically resistYou have the right to remain silent · US citizens cannot be forced to answer citizenship questions · You can ask for a lawyerDocument badge numbers if possible · Contact ACLU or National Lawyers Guild immediately after any encounter
Sources: Reason magazine, February 23, 2026 · American Immigration Council, February 2026 · Human Rights First · Newark Mayor Ras J. Baraka statement, January 2026 · National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Know Your Rights — Right Now

What You Can Do In Every Fourth Amendment Scenario

If ICE comes to your door
Do Not Open the Door
Ask through the door: “Do you have a judicial warrant signed by a judge?”
If they say yes, ask them to slide it under the door
An administrative warrant (I-205) does NOT require you to open the door
Remain silent beyond asking about the warrant
If they have a judicial warrant signed by a judge, you must comply
If stopped by police or ICE on the street
Stay Calm and Know the Questions
Ask: “Am I being detained or am I free to go?”
You have the right to remain silent in all circumstances
US citizens do not have to answer questions about immigration status
Do not physically resist even if the stop is unlawful
Physically resisting an unlawful stop creates new legal problems — comply, then challenge in court
At the border or airport
Prepare Your Phone Before You Travel
Use a cheap burner phone with minimal data for international travel
Log out of and delete sensitive apps before crossing
Store sensitive data in the cloud, not on the device
US citizens can refuse to unlock — cannot be denied entry for this
Non-citizens risk denial of entry for refusing device access — know the risk before deciding
If your home is searched
Do Not Consent — Get It on Record
Clearly say: “I do not consent to this search”
Do not physically interfere but verbally withhold consent
Ask to see and read the warrant carefully
Document what is taken — ask for a receipt
If they have a valid judicial warrant, they can proceed — your refusal is for the legal record

If Your Rights Are Violated

Document everything. Call immediately. You have 6 hours in many jurisdictions to preserve evidence.

Immigration
ACLU Immigration Rights
aclu.org/know-your-rights
Digital Privacy
Electronic Frontier Foundation
eff.org/pages/know-your-rights
At Protests / Arrests
National Lawyers Guild Hotline
nlg.org — find your local chapter
Peter Thiel · $970M in 2025 Contracts
Palantir: The Company Running the Government's Surveillance Machine — from ICE Deportations to Your Tax Records.
Your location, finances, and immigration status — searchable through one interface by ICE, the IRS, and the Pentagon. Named after the all-seeing crystal balls that corrupted their users in Lord of the Rings. The name was not accidental.
See What They Know →
RELATED — FOURTH AMENDMENT LOOPHOLE
CBP Is Buying Your Location From Your Apps. No Warrant Required.
The government has found a Fourth Amendment loophole: buying your location data commercially from ad data brokers doesn’t count as a "search." CBP confirmed it purchased location pings from the online advertising ecosystem. Courts have not yet ruled on this. Read the full explainer and what to do right now.
Read the Full Breakdown →
State Scrutiny editorial note:This page presents documented government actions and the legal analysis of constitutional law scholars, bar association presidents, and sitting US senators. The Trump administration’s position — that administrative warrants are constitutionally sufficient for home entry — is also represented above through DHS’s own statements. Courts are actively adjudicating these questions. This page will be updated as rulings come in. This is not legal advice. If you face an ICE or law enforcement encounter, contact a lawyer immediately.
Sources: CNN January 22, 2026 · PBS NewsHour January 22, 2026 · NBC News January 22, 2026 · Brennan Center for Justice February 3, 2026 · Just Security March 27, 2026 · Common Dreams · American Immigration Council February 2026 · Reason Magazine February 23, 2026 · EFF / ACLU amicus brief Third Circuit March 3, 2026 · FindLaw March 25, 2026 · Senators Markey and Wyden letter February 13, 2026 · Newark Mayor Baraka statement January 2026 · National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers · Human Rights First. Updated March 2026.